1. Why supreme court refused to take action on the pretext that the matter is not related to 2G scam whereas both the issues are related to revenue.
2. The court said that if the lowering of penalty was an illegal action, whosoever has the locus standi, will challenge it in the appropriate forum. The important question is then why SUPREME COURT entertains 'PIL'?
3. The SC bench said 'it is open for the CBI to investigate'. Is it supreme court version or Mr Sibal's advocasy?